What We Should Know about the People We Don't Know
Malcolm Gladwell, host of the podcast Revisionist History and author of the #1 New York Times bestsellers The Tipping Point, Blink, Outliers, David and Goliath, and What the Dog Saw, offers a powerful examination of our interactions with strangers and why they often go wrong.
Author:
Malcolm Gladwell
Published Year:
2019-01-01
First, let's look at the idea of "Default to Truth."
First, let's look at the idea of "Default to Truth." This is our inherent tendency to believe that the people we're interacting with are honest. It's a fundamental aspect of how we function as a society. Imagine a world where you constantly doubted everyone's sincerity. It would be chaos! You couldn't trust your doctor, your teacher, or even the person selling you groceries.
Gladwell uses the shocking case of Bernie Madoff, the financier who orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in history, to illustrate this point. For years, Madoff fooled investors, regulators, and even his own family. How? Because people defaulted to truth. They assumed he was a legitimate, successful businessman.
Think about your own life. Have you ever been scammed or lied to? It's likely that the person who deceived you exploited your default to truth. Maybe it was a friend who borrowed money and never paid it back, or a salesperson who promised something that wasn't true. We tend to believe people, especially those who seem trustworthy, until proven otherwise.
Here's how you can become more aware of your default to truth. When interacting with someone new, especially in situations involving high stakes, like financial transactions or important decisions, consciously remind yourself of this tendency. Ask yourself: "What evidence do I have to support this person's claims?" Don't just take things at face value. Do your own research, seek second opinions, and be willing to question your initial assumptions. It doesn't mean being cynical, but rather, being thoughtfully cautious. The book "Talking to Strangers" highlights this.
Now, let's move on to the second concept: Transparency.
Now, let's move on to the second concept: Transparency. This is the idea that people's external behavior and demeanor are reliable windows into their internal feelings and intentions. We assume that if someone is smiling, they're happy, or if they're crying, they're sad. But this is often a dangerous assumption.
Gladwell highlights the fascinating research of psychologist James Crivelli, who studied the facial expressions of the Trobriand Islanders. Crivelli showed them photographs of Westerners expressing various emotions. The Trobrianders' interpretations were wildly different from what Westerners would expect. "Talking to Strangers" uses this example.
A classic example is the case of Amanda Knox, an American student who was accused of murder in Italy. Knox's behavior during the investigation, which some perceived as cold and unemotional, was interpreted by many as evidence of her guilt. But Gladwell argues that Knox's demeanor might have been a result of her personality, cultural differences, or simply the stress of the situation. The assumption of transparency – that her outward behavior reflected her inner state – led to a flawed judgment. "Talking to Strangers" details this case.
So, how can you avoid falling into the transparency trap? Try this: When interacting with someone, especially someone from a different background or culture, be mindful of your own biases and assumptions. Don't jump to conclusions based solely on their outward expressions. Instead, focus on gathering more information, asking open-ended questions, and trying to understand their perspective. Listen to their words, not just their body language. Remember, what you see isn't always what you get. "Talking to Strangers" emphasizes this point.
Third, let's look at the concept of "Coupling."
Third, let's look at the concept of "Coupling." This refers to the idea that certain behaviors are strongly linked to specific contexts or environments. Gladwell uses the example of suicide rates in England to illustrate this point. In the 1960s, England began switching from coal gas, which contained high levels of carbon monoxide, to natural gas, which is much less toxic. As a result, suicide rates plummeted.
Another compelling example is the Kansas City gun experiment. In the 1990s, Kansas City had a high rate of gun violence. Police implemented a program focused on aggressively searching for illegal guns in high-crime areas. The results were dramatic: Gun crime dropped significantly in the targeted areas. But, and this is crucial, the crime didn't simply shift to other neighborhoods. It decreased overall. "Talking to Strangers" provides this example.
This demonstrates that crime, like suicide, can be coupled to specific situations and opportunities. Removing those opportunities, even without addressing the root causes of the behavior, can have a significant impact.
Here's how you can apply this concept: When trying to change a behavior, either in yourself or in others, consider the context. What are the triggers, the environmental cues, the readily available means that make the behavior more likely? By modifying the context, you can make it harder for the behavior to occur. "Talking to Strangers" offers this advice.
Levine's research, mentioned in "Talking to Strangers", shows that our accuracy in detecting deception is only slightly better than chance – around 54%. We're not nearly as good at spotting lies as we think we are.
The right way to talk to strangers is with caution and humility.
We think we can easily see into the hearts of others based on the flimsiest of clues.
We default to truth—even when that decision carries terrible risks—because we have no choice.
The conviction that we know others better than they know us—and that we may have insights about them they lack (but not vice versa)—leads us to talk when we would do well to listen.
To assume the best about another is the trait that has created modern society. Those occasions when our trusting nature gets violated are tragic. But the alternative—to abandon trust as a defense against predation and deception—is worse.
The times we are most likely to fall into the trap of default to truth are precisely when we should be most cautious.
We have, as societies, embraced enhanced interrogation because we think torture can be surgical and precise and carefully calibrated. But the science says the opposite.
There are clues to deceit and to the solving of puzzles. But they are subtle and ambiguous and exceedingly difficult to interpret.
By
Elizabeth Catte
By
Bruce Weinstein
By
Nathaniel Philbrick
By
Robin Wall Kimmerer
By
Shari Franke
By
Ezra Klein
By
Flatiron Author to be Revealed March 2025
By
Julie Holland M.D.
By
Richard Cooper
By
Brian Tracy