And Other Adventures
From the bestselling author of The Bomber Mafia, Talking to Strangers, and David and Goliath, What the Dog Saw is a collection of the best of Malcolm Gladwell's writing from The New Yorker.
Author:
Malcolm Gladwell
Published Year:
2009-10-20
First, let's look at the idea of late bloomers.
Gladwell tells the story of Ben Fountain, a lawyer who, in his early thirties, decided to quit his job and pursue his dream of becoming a writer. He spent years writing, facing rejection after rejection, feeling like he was getting nowhere. But he persisted. And eventually, he broke through. His first novel, *Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk*, became a critical and commercial success, winning the National Book Critics Circle Award.
Many great artists, writers, and thinkers didn't hit their stride until later in life. Think of Alfred Hitchcock, who didn't really find his style until he was much older. The key takeaway here is that creative genius comes in many forms. Some people are sprinters, bursting out of the gate with incredible speed. Others are marathon runners, slowly and steadily building their skills and insights over time.
Here's how you can apply this to your own life: Don't get discouraged if you haven't achieved your goals by some arbitrary deadline. Don't compare yourself to others who seem to be further along. Your path is your own. Embrace the journey, the process of learning and growing, and trust that your time will come. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" by Malcolm Gladwell provides many examples of this.
Late blooming is not an excuse for procrastination. It's about persistent effort, about honing your skills, about constantly striving to improve. It's about the willingness to fail, to learn from your mistakes, and to keep going, even when it feels like you're making no progress. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" emphasizes this.
Next, let's consider how much our surroundings influence us.
Gladwell explores what psychologists call the Fundamental Attribution Error. This is our tendency to overestimate the role of personality and underestimate the role of context in shaping behavior.
We see someone act a certain way, and we assume that's just who they are. We don't consider the circumstances, the situation, the environment that might be influencing their actions.
Understanding the Fundamental Attribution Error can make us more empathetic, more understanding, and less judgmental. It can help us see people in a more nuanced way, recognizing that their behavior is not always a reflection of their inherent character. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" showcases this concept.
The next time you find yourself judging someone's behavior, take a step back. Ask yourself, "What might be going on in their life? What circumstances might be influencing their actions?" This simple shift in perspective can make a world of difference. The book, "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" encourages this.
Now, let's shift gears and talk about something a little unexpected: plagiarism.
Gladwell delves into a fascinating case involving the playwright Bryony Lavery and her play, *Frozen*. *Frozen* tells the story of a psychiatrist who studies serial killers. A prominent psychiatrist named Dorothy Lewis, who specialized in studying murderers, saw the play and was shocked. She felt that Lavery had stolen not just ideas but specific details from her life and work.
Lewis had written a book about her experiences. She found numerous parallels between the play and her book, including specific phrases, anecdotes, and even character traits. She felt violated, as if her very essence had been stolen.
But when it comes to words, we have a much stricter standard. Plagiarism is considered a serious offense, a violation of intellectual property. And yet, as Gladwell points out, the line between inspiration and plagiarism can be blurry. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" discusses this at length.
The key takeaway here is that creativity is rarely a completely original act. It often involves building upon, transforming, and reinterpreting the work of others. The question is, where do we draw the line? When does borrowing become stealing? "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" asks this important question.
The difference is that plagiarism is about the *exact* replication of words, not concepts. It's the direct copying that's the violation. This is a key point made in "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures".
And, the last concept we will discuss is the job interview.
Most of us assume that job interviews are a reliable way to assess a candidate's suitability for a role. We believe that we can get a good sense of someone's personality, skills, and potential in an hour-long conversation.
Gladwell challenges this assumption, arguing that traditional job interviews are often deeply flawed. He introduces us to Justin Menkes, a human-resources consultant who specializes in structured interviewing.
Menkes believes that most interviews are too unstructured, too reliant on gut feelings and first impressions. He argues that interviewers often ask easy questions that allow candidates to present a carefully crafted, rehearsed image of themselves. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" details Menkes' views.
Menkes advocates for a different approach. He asks questions that are designed to reveal a candidate's true tendencies, their underlying thought processes, their approach to problem-solving.
Hiring someone is a bit like dating. You're trying to get to know someone, to see if there's a connection, to assess whether they're a good match. But you can't do that in a single, superficial encounter. You need to dig deeper, to ask the right questions, to observe their behavior in different situations. "What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures" makes this analogy.
The trick to learning how to cook is to pay attention to what makes you go 'Yum.'
The key to good decision making isn’t knowledge. It is understanding. We are swimming in the former. We are desperately lacking in the latter.
We have, as human beings, a storytelling problem. We’re a bit too quick to come up with explanations for things we don’t really have an explanation for.
There can be as much value in the blink of an eye as in months of rational analysis.
The visionary starts with a clean sheet of paper, and re-imagines the world.
Good writing does not succeed or fail on the strength of its ability to persuade. It succeeds or fails on the strength of its ability to engage you, to make you think, to give you a glimpse into someone else's head.
Success has to do with deliberate practice. Practice must be focused, determined, and in an environment where there's feedback.
What is learned on the athletic field is not forgotten, nor are the conclusions reached there ever completely abandoned.
By
Elizabeth Catte
By
Bruce Weinstein
By
Nathaniel Philbrick
By
Robin Wall Kimmerer
By
Shari Franke
By
Ezra Klein
By
Flatiron Author to be Revealed March 2025
By
Julie Holland M.D.
By
Richard Cooper
By
Brian Tracy